Saturday, April 19, 2008

wake.

compassion is an incredible thing. it is world-altering. compassion is what compels us to reach out to those whom circumstances have left wanting. children without parents. widows. the starving. the sick. the dying. compassion makes their world different than what it would have been without. it is a strong characteristic of Christ. in fact, He demands compassion of us. isaiah is full of this demand. God tells us He is weary of our pathetic forms of religion with our rules and ceremonies. He says He longs to see us move in compassion...to reach out to the orphans and the widows. to love on the down and out. it's a calling.

compassion is one of many of Christ's characteristics. it is one of the easier ones, in my opinion. human nature is compassionate...there are few humans who would not be grieved to see a child die. it is born in us.

grace on the other hand is a little harder to give, though it is just as much a characteristic of Christ. grace is the movement that swims through the wake of sin. and the wake of sin is rough waters.

in the wake of sin is nothing but destruction. it is debilitating, depressing, devastating (i'm not actually meaning to alliterate, but it's kind of cool), its own ground zero. without any other factor, without any other repercussion, the aftermath of sin alone is enough to drive us all to the cross.

this is the beauty of the cross...of Christ himself: He walks over the devastating waters of the wake of sin. He takes our hand. He says, "You're not only going to survive this, you're going to walk on it." that's grace. that while we were YET SINNERS, he died.

we still sin, friends. you're very misguided if you think we don't. think of the person in your life who reminds you most of Christ...the one who you look up to and lean on for spiritual guidance and strength. that person sins. yep. everyday. maybe their sins are what you would call small. maybe their sins are "simple" (not easy, but simple) sins of not trusting God fully with their finances, or dismissing their children every once in a while. maybe their sins are what you would call darker...twisting the truth for the public eye, or lusty thoughts and actions. here's the thing, though, kids. the sin is the same to God. it requires the same cross and the same grace and the same Savior. it is the SAME. the difference, and the reason we see it so differently, is the wake. the wake of the sin of not trusting Him with finances is not as apparent... it does not necessarily leave others wounded. it does not show up all the time. it is more subtle and more individual. the wake of the sin of adultery, however, is much more devastating. it wounds and destroys everything around it. it leaves people broken and afraid and hollow and uncomfortable and unsure. but the sin is the same. and the grace is the same.

we are called to be people of grace just as much as we are called to be people of compassion. i am not always graceful...this blog is a conviction for me as much as it is a plea to you because there are people...maybe one in particular...who i have no grace in my heart for. i want him to hurt and to feel shame and regret and guilt and all the things that grace relieves. i want to condemn him for not offering grace, and in that same moment, i commit the same sin i want to condemn him for. these words are not accusation, they are conviction. please hear that as i type. i don't know who might read this blog...or who began it and never got this far because it was so dang long. but please hear this: you are required to offer grace. if you think that you are justified to condemn...that circumstances have given you the right to drive someone deeper into the devastating waves of the wake of sin, you (like me) are wrong. you are sinning. while the Lord is reaching His hand out to pull someone out of those waves, you are pushing his or her head down below the current. and you are wrong. and so am i.

sin is its own damage. you are not needed to prove its consequence. rather, you are needed to prove grace. this does not mean ignoring the sin. it doesn't mean absolving it (we don't have that right, authority, or power). it doesn't mean pretending the devastation is not there. it means you are meant to be a support as He reaches down into the waves. so am i. and i resent it sometimes. and that sin of resentment is covered by the same grace that covers the sin i resent. it's the beauty of the cross. if you want proof that this is the character of Jesus, read John 4. read John 8. read John 12. freakin' read the whole Bible. amazing grace. do i offer it? do you?

8 comments:

brad johnson said...

May I post this whole thing on my blog for tomorrow (Monday?) so well said.

Simplifying me said...

Amen, Amen, Amennnnnnnn!!! Couldn't say it any better. I hear your heart because my heart beats the same tune. I pray God quiets the drums and softens the words so that we have peace as we strive to be grace givers.

Anonymous said...

Speaking of taking care of the orphans, please visit www.cohcommunity.org to find out how you can get involved in doing exactly that!

Anonymous said...

We are human, and therefore we do not always give grace where we "should". We strive for it but do not always succeed. To me, the striving is what keeps us free from sin, and the failure to give grace to everyone who has wronged us, is not a sin. It is part of a bigger picture. Forgiveness is not the same as grace. To me, grace has to do more with my actions TOWARD a person. I believe that turning away from a person is somehow justified. After forgiveness of course. It is most often those who have sinned with absolute malice who demand grace from others. To me, it is a joke. The Lord recognizes it. There is not question about that.
A fellow blogger of yours who has admitted to various sins of his own while a pastor (imagine that !!!... LOL) wants grace from everyone. He gives the poor example of loving lepers regardless. Pure ignorance on his part. One does not CHOOSE to be a leper. Certainly no leper would CHOOSE to be a leper. When one CHOOSES to sin, be self-righteous, try to re-invent himself as a rock and roll "I'm so in demand" media and attention getter, it, too is a choice. The nature of his lies and sins against our church and his whole family... was a CHOICE. Each time. Each time he did it. Some of us have forgiven him. But does that mean we will hold him tight to our circle of trust and friendship? No. And there is nothing wrong with us. There are "plenty of fish in the sea" who have not made that choice. In his case, he chastizes others for choosing not to associate with him. He is unlike a leper with whom he compares himself. He made choices.
yes... the Lord says to forgive. We have. The Lord says grant him grace. I and others say "grant him space. There is no need for him in our lives. Wish him grace? Yes... toward others. Quiet grace. There is no sin in that. There is love of self and others in that. There is simply no time or reason to do otherwise, as there are no real signs of change. Wish him well? Absolutely. Buy into his current dribble? Why? For those for whom it works, great. But do not chastise those who forgive but remember. That is true grace. Loving one's self enough to go toward the light and not the darkness.
Helen from Thousand Oaks.
My first post, by the way !!!

loisa said...

hi helen!!

welcome to the wonderful world of blogging! you sure picked a doosey to start with.

i don't have much of a response simply because your hurt is none of my business. my blog was based on many situations with many different people...all of which have struck me as being devastatingly low on grace. i cannot tell you, nor do i have any desire to tell you, that you are wrong to be hurt...wrong to question his sincerity now...wrong to be suspicious. of course you would be. trust was broken. i've had my trust broken many a time. and i know how long the road to repair is.

please hear this, though, in my blog. i am perplexed and vexed at those who find enough self-righteousness in them to drive someone like brad or any other person who is recovering from such damaging sin (that they themselves chose in wrong and in disobedience) deeper into the pain of it. i will say that neither you nor i really know what Papa is doing in brad's life. and because of that, neither you nor i get to have an opinion about it.

instead, my opinion is on those who are casting stones. not just with this situation, mind you, but with more situations than i wish i were aware of. stones are being hurtled within church walls left and right. and i am done pretending it is okay. the Word tells us it's not. the Word tells us a lot of things about this situation. never does the Word tell us to maim. even if the "culprit" did some maiming his or her self.

i by no means point a finger at you, helen. this is simply what has been hurting my heart lately and what has kept me out of church for the last year. i don't want to get hit in the crossfire of hurtled stones anymore.

respect and appreciate so much that you have responded and especially left your name! i hope you consider blogging. please let me know if you do. and if you have any desire to talk further about this mess we call church and the beauty of it, i would definitely be open to that. thank you again!

Anonymous said...

Hi... It's Helen again. First, how do I "sign up" to get my name in color and everything?
Anyhow, I just want to give you a distinction about what I've been saying. You make it sound like I and others are dwelling in the "hurt" or casting stones. It is so easy to say that ... but it's not at all true. I am "commenting", like Brad is making comments. Of COURSE there are some whose anger causes them to actively "make things right" as they see it. There are all sorts of people on earth and they will do what they want. The majority simply want nothing to do with him and have left it at that. That's what you guys have to realize. It's like the spider (notice I didn't say rat) that walked out of the building. to some he's gone and good riddence... they move on with life. Others want to squish him outside. Such is life. All sorts of people and perspectives that Papa has planetized us with.
Stones can be cast when the topic is brought up. There is nothing wrong with certain kinds of "stones" being cast in some cases. Our faith, of course, has gone to war, casting more than stones. Truth is one kind of "stone" that must be cast against darkness. Love is one kind of "stone" that must be cast against hate. Indifference and "oh well" are the "stones" cast against this former trusted pastor. Most are indifferent to him now and shake their heads about his "makeover". That does not mean we do not wish him healing.
But to cast stones against those who have moved on and regret his blatant pooing ... as he would put it... on all of us.. is so hypocritcal and makes things too simple. As a Jewish friend once pointed out to me... the passage in the bible about someone without sin casting the first stone does not address who gets to cast the SECOND stone. I always found that funny... but true. Stoning was VERY much "condoned" back then. It's a historical fact.
I wish healing on our church, on the men and women who were misled and derided by him and on those who lost their jobs because of it. And I wish true healing on him, on me and on all.
To me, that is grace. The "stoning" of hypocrisy is true grace. With love.
I don't mean to cause rancor... it's really a strength of perspective. Pastor DeWitt talked of such a strength long ago.
That is all. Time to meditate....
Helen

Anonymous said...

Hey... Ron Killian here. I read all the above and as a former regular at CCC I see where everyone is coming from. I heard about all this as it was happening and then moved closer into the Valley so I stopped going to CCC. I was a fan of Brad's, but always a bit suspicious. Anyhow, I think that Loisa you talk about driving him deeper into dispair. That sort of means someone's doing something to do that. And no one can do that simply by ignoring another person who wants their attention. Part of "letting go" to some people, is letting go of a bad relationship, and they think the relationship with the pseudo pastor or any other person who has shunned them by their actions is simply like saying, I choose to concentrate on those who are good for me and let the others go. That's not driving someone anywhere... that takes a concerted effort.
On the other hand, only Brad will know if he has changed, and frankly, not alot of people are dwelling on that now. it's done, let him be, let him burn out, let him get his own cable show.. Let him be. And let him go. He walked out... no one chased him. Grace be to him and no one has an obligation to baby sit his "pain" or whatever.
Hey to all my friends still in the Conejo. I just wanted to weigh in on it. If I stop going to the dry cleaner who stole my clothes, am I driving him deeper into dispair simply because he misses me? or am I making a good choice? Brad's "stuff" isn't my business any more than mine is his. Except he once pretended to care. He'll remember me.
Ron

loisa said...

hi friends...
i just want to clarify real quick:

the bummer about blogs is that a lot has to be assumed...tone, intention, etc. i do my best to express what i really feel and who i really am, but sometimes there's just not enough cyberspace to hold it all.

since brad linked to this entry, which i am so glad and honored that he did, i feel that many read it assuming i am speaking specifically of his situation. please know that i am not. although the state he is in does hurt my heart for him and everyone stuck in the wake of it, i speak of the wreckage i see in a lot of churches, not just yours (whoever you may be).

i also am not speaking to those who deal with things in silence. i am continually amazed at what people SAY and DO as believers and feel that they are justified in it because of their pain. please do not assume that if you read this i am accusing you specifically by any means.

i'd encourage any who happen upon this to please read the blog through really hearing my heart...not assuming the worst of my intent, but truly hearing the words i'm saying. i think you'll find there is little to be defensive of. this is truly a conviction to me...i'm just inviting anyone else along in the conviction.

lastly, i don't love "arguing" over blog. i do have responses to those who have left comments...mostly that i truly have no judgement for you...but if i have offended, or if you simply are unsettled by this and want to talk it out, please feel free to e-mail me privately: loisamarie@hotmail.com